Collective Trauma, Cultural Memory, and the Psychology of Unfreedom in Contemporary Installation Art of Kazakhstan: A Psychocultural Analysis
Downloads
Objective: To examine how contemporary installation art in Kazakhstan articulates the interconnected fields of historical trauma, cultural memory, unfreedom, and collective identity, and to clarify how spatial, material, and affective strategies contribute to psychocultural meaning-making.
Methods and Materials: A qualitative interpretive analysis was conducted on selected installation-based works by Kazakhstani artists from 2013 onward. The analysis combined art-historical interpretation with concepts from trauma studies, memory studies, affect theory, postmemory, and expanded scenography, drawing on artworks, exhibition contexts, artist interviews where available, and selected digital materials.
Findings: Across the analyzed works, fragmented portraits, archival documents, textiles, ready-made objects, sound, and spatial obstruction functioned as material carriers of traumatic memory. Installations addressing the repressions of 1937 and contemporary social violence repeatedly transformed historical absence into embodied encounters with fear, mourning, vulnerability, and remembrance. At the same time, some works shifted from “dark” memory toward symbolic repair, compassion, and the possibility of working through collective trauma.
Conclusion: Installation art in contemporary Kazakhstan operates as a psychocultural space in which traumatic history is not merely represented but materially reorganized for reflection. Its immersive and affective capacities enable artists to connect postmemory, collective identity, and contemporary social concerns while inviting viewers to participate in processes of remembrance and critical interpretation.
Downloads
Alexander, J. C. (2004). Toward a theory of cultural trauma. In Cultural trauma and collective identity (pp. 1–30). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520235946.003.0001
Alexander, J. C. (2016). Culture trauma, morality and solidarity: The social construction of “Holocaust” and other mass murders. Thesis Eleven, 132(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513615625239
Andersen, T. S., & Ortner, J. (2019). Introduction: Memories of joy. Memory Studies, 12(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698018811976
Artaud, A. (2000). The theatre and its double. Symposium. (Russian edition). https://books.google.com/books?q=Antonin+Artaud+The+Theatre+and+Its+Double
Baiburin, A. K. (1989). Semiotic aspects of the functioning of things. In Ethnographic study of cultural sign systems (pp. 63–88). Nauka. (In Russian). https://kronk.spb.ru/library/1989-l-eizsk.htm
Bennett, J. (2005). Empathic vision: Affect, trauma, and contemporary art. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=HrCF0QEACAAJ
Bokesh, T., Meirbayev, B. B., & Tuna, Y. (2026). Cultural memory, identity, and digital transformation in contemporary Kazakh visual art: A psychocultural analysis. International Journal of Body, Mind and Culture, 13(8), Article e2026–1687. https://doi.org/10.61838/ijbmc.v13i8.1687
Burke, E. (1979). A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful. Iskusstvo. (Russian edition; original work published 1757). https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/On_the_Sublime_and_Beautiful
Deleuze, G. (2016). Lectures on Spinoza (1978–1981). Ad Marginem Press. (Russian edition). https://garagemca.org/en/programs/publishing/gilles-deleuze-gilles-deleuze-lectures-on-spinoza
Goli, F. (2026). Collective trauma, political violence, and the critical need for an integrated mental health care. International Journal of Body, Mind and Culture, 13(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.61838/ijbmc.v13i2.1355
Hann, R. (2019). Beyond scenography. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429489136
Hirsch, M. (1997). Family frames: Photography, narrative and postmemory. Harvard University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=W4rEQgAACAAJ
Irina Kairatovna. (2021). 5000 [Music video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jk7Ff9s2nkw
LaCapra, D. (2001). Writing history, writing trauma. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=yA5ms7rnSv0C
Nikolaeva, O. (2021). Infinite presence and permanent absence: The role of scenography, materiality and affective processes in the representation of trauma in contemporary Russian theatre. Communications. Media. Design, 6(4), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.17323/cmd.2021.13760
Petersen, A. R. (2015). Installation art: Between image and stage. Museum Tusculanum Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/I/bo20193173.html
Sztompka, P. (2001). Social change as trauma. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, 1, 6–16. (In Russian). http://www.isras.ru/files/File/Socis/01-2001/Shtompka.pdf
Venediktova, T. (2020). Affect – na “A” [Affect – with “A”]. Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 164(4). (In Russian). https://nlobooks.ru/article/15136/
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Body, Mind and Culture
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
