Augmented Reality Has The Potential To Improve Learning Motivation In Physical Education: A Systematic Review
Background: Augmented reality (AR) is rapidly advancing as a transformative tool in educational technology, which is significantly enhancing learning experiences.
Objective: This study investigates the potential of AR to improve learning motivation in physical education.
Methods: A systematic review method was conducted, analyzing articles from leading databases like PubMed, focusing on the effectiveness of AR in educational settings. The inclusion criteria were articles published in the last five years, discussing interval learning and cardiorespiratory improvements through AR.
Results: The results revealed a moderate positive impact of AR on student achievement, particularly in STEM fields, with the effect becoming more pronounced over time. Factors such as the integration of mobile devices and multimedia-based content were identified as key enhancers of AR's effectiveness. The study also highlighted AR's ability to provide personalized learning experiences, making it especially beneficial for students with diverse abilities and needs. This research makes a significant contribution to the academic literature by providing strong evidence of AR's potential to increase motivation and improve learning outcomes in physical education. It also offers practical implications for educators and policymakers, suggesting that AR can be effectively integrated into education curriculum to create engaging and interactive learning environments. The findings underscore the importance of exploring new technologies to enhance the quality of education and suggest directions for future research, such as investigating the long-term effects of AR and its integration with other emerging technologies. Given the urgency of improving physical education to promote healthy lifestyles among young generation, this study is both timely and relevant.
Conclusions: It provides valuable insights for the development of innovative teaching practices that can lead to better student engagement and success. As such, this article is a worthy contribution to the field of educational technology.
Downloads
Alkhabra, Y. A., Ibrahem, U. M., & Alkhabra, S. A. (2023). Augmented reality technology in enhancing learning retention and critical thinking according to STEAM program. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01650-w
Chang, Y. S., Hu, K. J., Chiang, C. W., & Lugmayr, A. (2020). Applying mobile augmented reality (AR) to teach interior design students in layout plans: Evaluation of learning effectiveness based on the ARCS model of learning motivation theory. Sensors (Switzerland), 20(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/s20010105
Chen, C. A., & Lai, H. I. (2021). Application of augmented reality in museums – Factors influencing the learning motivation and effectiveness. Science Progress, 104(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504211059045
Chen, Y., & Zhao, S. Z. (2022). Understanding Chinese EFL Learners ’ Acceptance of Gamified Vocabulary Learning Apps : An Integration of Self-Determination Theory and Technology Acceptance Model. Harbin Institute of Technology, 14(11288).
Chin, K. Y., Chang, H. L., & Wang, C. S. (2023). Applying a wearable MR-based mobile learning system on museum learning activities for university students. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2228843
Chugh, R., Turnbull, D., Cowling, M. A., Vanderburg, R., & Vanderburg, M. A. (2023). Implementing educational technology in Higher Education Institutions: A review of technologies, stakeholder perceptions, frameworks and metrics. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16403–16429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639- 023-11846-x
Cw, M. (2019). Nursing Students’ Perceptions of Biomedical Education with Augmented Reality. Integrative Biomedical Sciences, 5(1), 70–73.
Delgado-Rodríguez, S., Domínguez, S. C., & Garcia-Fandino, R. (2023). Design, Development and Validation of an Educational Methodology Using Immersive Augmented Reality for STEAM Education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.1.1250
Dinh, A., Yin, A. L., Estrin, D., Greenwald, P., & Fortenko, A. (2023). Augmented Reality in Real-time Telemedicine and Telementoring: Scoping Review. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 11. https://doi.org/10.2196/45464
Dutta, R., Mantri, A., Singh, G., & Singh, N. P. (2023). Measuring the Impact of Augmented Reality in Flipped Learning Mode on Critical Thinking, Learning Motivation, and Knowledge of Engineering Students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(6), 912–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10051-2
Ebadi, S., & Ashrafabadi, F. (2022). An exploration into the impact of augmented reality on EFL. Education and Information Technologies, 9745–9765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11021-8
Elford, D., Lancaster, S. J., & Jones, G. A. (2022). Exploring the Effect of Augmented Reality on Cognitive Load, Attitude, Spatial Ability, and Stereochemical Perception. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(3), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09957-0
Garzón, C. A., Kinshuk, Duarte, J., & Betancourt, J. (2021). Augmented Reality in Education: An Overview of Twenty-Five Years of Research. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 5(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5070037
Gholizadeh, G., & Rahimi, M. (2023). The mediating role of academic self-regulation in the relationship between autocorrect use and vocabulary size. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2).
Groh, R. (2021). Konzeption und Umsetzung von Lehr- und Lernszenarien unter Verwendung einer prototypischen 3D-Tafel - als Beitrag innovativer digitaler Medien in Schulen. In Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2021 (Vol. 1, Issue 1). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2021-mci-ws09-379
Harley, J. M., Bilgic, E., Lau, C. H. H., Gorgy, A., Marchand, H., Lajoie, S. P., Lavoie-tremblay, M., & Fried, G. M. (2023). Nursing Students Reported More Positive Emotions About Training During Coronavirus Disease 2019 ( COVID-19 ) After Using a Virtual Simulation Paired With an In-person Simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 81, 101420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2023.04.006
Hsiao, K., Chen, N., & Huang, S. (2012). Learning while exercising for science education in augmented reality among adolescents. 4820. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2010.486682
Kann, D. H. H. Van, Koolwijk, P., Kok, T. De, Vos, S. B., Vries, S. I. De, Mombarg, R., Aart, I. Van, Savelsbergh,
G. J. P., Hoeboer, J. J. M. M., & Remmers, T. (2022). Applying an ecosystem approach to explore modifiable factors related to the risk for lowmotor competence in young children. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 25(11), 890–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2022.08.014
Laurens-Arredondo, L. (2022). Mobile augmented reality adapted to the ARCS model of motivation: a case study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 7927–7946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10933-9
Liao, S.-C., & Kuo, M.-J. (2020). An Analysis for Motivating Sketching Practice with Augmented Reality in Da Vinci Eye. 2020 International Symposium on Computer, Consumer and Control (IS3C), 95–97. https://doi.org/10.1109/IS3C50286.2020.00032
Lin, X. F., Wong, S. Y., Zhou, W., Shen, W., Li, W., & Tsai, C. C. (2024). Undergraduate Students’ Profiles of Cognitive Load in Augmented Reality–Assisted Science Learning and Their Relation to Science Learning Self-efficacy and Behavior Patterns. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(2), 419–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10376-9
Loeb, D., Shoemaker, J., Parsons, A., Schumacher, D., & Zackoff, M. (2023). How Augmenting Reality Changes the Reality of Simulation: Ethnographic Analysis. JMIR Medical Education, 9, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2196/45538
Nekar, D. M., Kang, H. Y., & Yu, J. H. (2022). Improvements of Physical Activity Performance and Motivation in Adult Men through Augmented Reality Approach: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3050424
Nielsen, B. L., Swensen, H., & Brandt, H. (2016). Augmented Reality in science education – affordances for student learning Abstract. December 2017. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.2399
Ramos, R. C. (2024). Realidade virtual Na educacao Fundamentos, Dispositivos, Aplicações e Inovação no Ensino.
-9128.
Saidin, N. F., Dayana, N., Halim, A., & Yahaya, N. (2015). A Review of Research on Augmented Reality in Education : Advantages and Applications. International Education Studies, 8(13), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n13p1
Silén, C., Karlgren, K., Hjelmqvist, H., Meister, B., Zeberg, H., & Pettersson, A. (2022). Three ‑ dimensional visualisation of authentic cases in anatomy learning – An educational design study. BMC Medical Education, 22:477, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03539-9
Sultoni, K., Peralta, L. R., & Cotton, W. (2022). Using a design-based research approach to develop a technology- supported physical education course to increase the physical activity levels of university students: Study protocol paper. PLoS ONE, 17(12 December), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269759
Wen, Y., Wu, L., He, S., Ng, N. H. E., Teo, B. C., Looi, C. K., & Cai, Y. (2023). Integrating augmented reality into inquiry-based learning approach in primary science classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(4), 1631–1651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10235-y
Zhao, X., Liu, M., & Liu, Y. (2022). The Influence of Different Learning Strategies on Pupils’ Learning Motivation: Is Augmented Reality Multimedia Learning Consistent With Traditional Text Learning? Frontiers in Psychology, 13(February). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.810345.
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Body, Mind and Culture
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
