Mythological Paradigms in Kazakh Painting: The Intersection of Folklore and History
Downloads
This article explores the manifestations of mythological paradigms in contemporary Kazakh painting by analyzing selected works by Kazakh artists created from the late 20th to the early 21st century. Drawing on the concept of bricolage—a form of pre-logical, early human thinking—the study argues that this approach remains relevant in modern art, where artists consciously adopt it. While historical bricolage emerged organically, many scholars note that its modern artistic application differs significantly: in 20th-century art, bricolage becomes a deliberate creative strategy used to construct or imitate myth and is examined in this study using methods of visual art analysis (formal analysis of composition, color, symbols, and stylistic features), combined with semiotic and chronological approaches. Though traditional mythologies may have faded, the mythic mindset endures. Even as cohesive mythic narratives disintegrate, myth continues to shape human consciousness—acting as a latent, organizing framework embedded within cognitive processes. This unconscious mythological structure, detached from religious roots, influences how individuals perceive and interpret the world. The result is a fragmented, collage-like worldview that mirrors the aesthetic of much contemporary art and reflects features of mythological thinking and cognition as discussed in classical theoretical approaches (Freud, Jung, Lévi-Strauss), which are applied to the interpretation of specific artworks. This theoretical framework is supported by visual and semiotic analyses of specific paintings that illustrate how mythological structures shape the composition, symbolism, and thematic organization in contemporary Kazakh art.
Downloads
Babuts, N. (2014). Mircea Eliade: Myth, religion, and history. Transaction Publishers. DOI:10.4324/9781315124575-7
Batrakova, S. (2002). Iskusstvo i mif: Iz istorii zhivopisi XX veka [Art and myth: From the history of the twentieth-century painting]. M.: Nauka. DOI:10.12731/2576-9782-2023-3-117-132
Brooks, P. (1994). Aesthetics and Ideology: What Happened to Poetics? Critical Inquiry, 20(3), 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1086/448723
Campbell, J. (1959). The historical development of mythology. Daedalus, 88(2), 232-254. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20026493
Cassirer, E. (1953). The philosophy of symbolic forms: Volume 4: The Metaphysics of symbolic forms (Vol. 4). Yale University Press. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300074338/the-philosophy-of-symbolic-forms/
Eliade, M. (2016). Cosmogonic myth and “sacred history”. In Myths and Mythologies (pp. 167-180). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315475776-14/cosmogonic-myth-sacred-history-mircea-eliade
Fritz, C. (2026). Paleolithic Art as a Dynamic Symbolic System. Alterity and Human Evolution: Deep-Time and Multispecies Perspectives on Difference and Variation, 298. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.35003829.18
Gaier, U. (2009). Myth, Mythology, New Mythology. A companion to the works of Johann Gottfried Herder, 173, 178. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781571137289-010
Jung, C. G., & Hull, R. (2023). Archetypes Of The Collective Unconscious 1. In Collected Works of CG Jung (pp. v9i_3-v9i_41). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032652047-170
Kabanova, D. S. (2011). Sites of memory: soviet myths in post-Soviet culture. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://www.proquest.com/openview/d2c8c2c4a42350d1efabecd1fc8790fb/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
Kelsinbek, M., Sharipova, D., Kenjakulova, A., & Kobzhanova, S. (2024). Transformation of the image of family in the visual culture of Kazakhstan. New design ideas, 8(3), 697-714. https://doi.org/10.62476/ndi83697
Kulsarieva, A., Sultanova, M., & Shaigozova, Z. N. (2018). Folklore and identity: history, memory and myth-making in the modern visual culture of Kazakhstan. News of the national academy of sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Series of social and human sciences, 5(321), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.32014/2018.2224-5294.3
Leak, A. N. (1994). Barthes: Mythologies. Grant and Cutler. https://books.google.com.tr/books/about/Barthes_Mythologies.html?id=BJoEAAAAYAAJ&redir_esc=y
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1955). The structural study of myth. The Journal of American folklore, 68(270), 428-444. https://doi.org/10.2307/536768
Losev, A. (1976). The Symbol and Artistic Creativity. Soviet Studies in Literature, 12(3), 70-89. https://doi.org/10.2753/RSL1061-1975120370
Lotman, Y. M. (1992). Selected articles. Tallinn: Аleksandra, 1. DOI:10.24147/1812-3996.2024.2.46-56
Mauss, M. (2016). Art and myth, according to Wilhelm Wundt. In Saints, Heroes, Myths, and Rites (pp. 17-38). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315632292
Meletinsky, E. M. (2013). The poetics of myth. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203820308
PASHAEVA, S., & PASHAEV, O. (2008). Ancient Myth and Modern Science. BİLİM ve SANAT, 37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337824869_ANCIENT_MYTH_AND_MODERN_SCIENCE
Pivoev, V. (1991). Mythological consciousness as a way of mastering the world. Petrozavodsk: Karelia. DOI:10.18522/2070-1403-2023-96-1-33-41
Samuratova, T. K., Musalimov, T., Albytova, N., Makhanov, M., & Omarbekova, N. (2015). Space and time as the fundamental elements of Kazakh World Image. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 127-132. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s2p127
Segal, R. A. (2003). Jung's very twentieth‐century view of myth. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 48(5), 593-617. https://doi.org/10.1111/1465-5922.00422
Trubshaw, B. (2006). An overview of mythological theory. Foamy Custard, 7. https://www.indigogroup.co.uk/foamycustard/fc005.htm
Tylor, E. B. (1877). Primitive Culture: Researches Into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Languages, Art and Customs (Vol. 1). H. Holt. https://archive.org/details/primitiveculture01tylouoft
Uskembaeva, R. M., Zhanysbekova, E. T., Orazbaeva, H., & Saparbaeva, K. J. (2016). Myth and Kazakh mythology: Retrospective analysis and prospects of research. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(22), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i22/95559
Zimmerman, R. L. (1968). Lévi-Strauss and the primitive. Commentary, 45(5), 54. https://www.proquest.com/openview/4c3bdf95284b9c62afe8e1394dcd737b/1.pdf?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1816616
Zuev, Y. A. (2002). Early Turks: Essays of History and Ideology. Oriental Studies Institute, ed.: IN Tasmagambetov, MX Abuseitova, JG Baranova et al., Daik-Press, Almaty. 10.53718/gttad.1012495
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Body, Mind and Culture

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








