Prosecutors' Performance: The Role of Emotional Intelligence, Motivation, and Organizational Support
Objective: This study aims to investigate how prosecutors' dynamic capabilities are developed by examining the impact of emotional intelligence, motivation, and organizational support on prosecutorial performance.
Methods and Materials: The data were analyzed using a qualitative thematic analysis approach, which allowed for the identification of recurring patterns, themes, and meanings within the collected data. The analysis followed an iterative process, involving data coding, categorization, and interpretation to ensure a rich and nuanced understanding of prosecutors' experiences. To enhance the credibility and trustworthiness of the findings, triangulation was applied by cross-verifying data from interviews, observations, and document analysis. Additionally, member checking was conducted to validate interpretations with participants, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the results.
Findings: The findings suggest that emotional intelligence is essential for fair decision-making and effective stress management in the workplace. Prosecutors with higher emotional intelligence demonstrated better self-regulation, empathy, and adaptability, which enabled them to handle ethical dilemmas, high-pressure situations, and interpersonal conflicts more effectively. Several participants shared experiences where emotional awareness helped them remain impartial in assessing evidence, communicating with victims and defendants, and mitigating courtroom tensions. Observational data further revealed that prosecutors who effectively managed their emotions were better equipped to handle demanding caseloads without compromising their well-being or judgment. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation drive professionalism and dedication in carrying out duties. Prosecutors expressed that a strong sense of justice and personal fulfillment served as intrinsic motivators, while career progression, recognition, and institutional incentives acted as extrinsic drivers. Interview data revealed that individuals with a deep commitment to justice demonstrated higher resilience and job satisfaction, even in challenging work environments. Document analysis of performance evaluations and policy reports supported this, indicating that prosecutors with strong motivation demonstrated greater consistency in their decision-making and adherence to ethical guidelines.
Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of a holistic approach to human resource development in the prosecutorial environment to improve the effectiveness and integrity of the judicial system. Academically, this study expands the literature on human resource development within law enforcement institutions by examining how psychological and organizational factors shape prosecutors' professional performance, addressing a gap that often overlooks the human elements of judicial work. Additionally, by emphasizing the roles of emotional intelligence, motivation, and organizational support, this research bridges the fields of psychology and legal studies, offering a multidisciplinary perspective on prosecutorial effectiveness. Furthermore, this study advances dynamic capability theory by illustrating how emotional intelligence and institutional support function as critical capabilities that enable prosecutors to navigate complex legal situations, manage stress effectively, and maintain professional integrity. By extending the application of this theory beyond corporate and business contexts to the legal sector, the study provides new insights into how adaptability and resilience contribute to the effectiveness of judicial institutions. These contributions provide a robust academic foundation for future research on the interplay between individual competencies and organizational structures in shaping the performance and ethical decision-making of legal professionals.
Downloads
Arfara, C., & Samanta, I. (2016). The Impact of Emotional Intelligence on Improving Team-working: The Case of Public Sector (National Centre for Public Administration and Local Government - N.C.P.A.L.G.). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230, 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.021
Djafar, M., & Chandra, T. Y. (2022). Kewenangan Penuntut Umum Selaku Dominus Litis Dalam Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-i, 9(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v9i4.26640
Fadilah, L., & Hamami, T. (2021). Kepemimpinan Trasformasional dalam Pendidikan Islam. EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 3(6), 4186–4197. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i6.1381
Faisal, F., & Darmawan, A. (2024). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Kejaksaan Negeri Kota Bogor. Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 1(9), Article 9.
Falato, F. (2020). The criminal action against the new European investigation measures. Method and contents of a dogmatic category revisited in light of the entry into operation of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office amidst regulatory physiologies and defects in the enabling law. Archivio Penale, 73(3), 1–89. Scopus.
Fatilhah, A. R. F. A. R., Nur, D. E. N., Romadona, H. I., & Supriyadi, T. (2024). Peran Psikologi Forensik Dalam Penegakan Hukum. Liberosis: Jurnal Psikologi Dan Bimbingan Konseling, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3287/liberosis.v9i1.9397
Helaluddin, & Wijaya, H. (2019). Analisis Data Kualitatif: Sebuah Tinjauan Teori & Praktik. Sekolah Tinggi Theologia Jaffray.
Hersyanda, M. D., Lubis, I. S., Ikhwan, N., Septriani, D., & Haqqi, M. (2024). Efektivitas Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pengulangan Kejahatan (Residivisme) di Indonesia. Jimmi: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, 1(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.71153/jimmi.v1i3.141
Hibatullah, M. N., Rusmiati, E., & Takariawan, A. (2024). Akibat Hukum Penerapan Restorative Justice Oleh Kejaksaan Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika. Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v7i1.20965
Hilmawan, I. (2024). The Role of Emotional Intelligence in Enhancing Workplace Relationships and Performance. Management Studies and Business Journal (PRODUCTIVITY), 1(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.62207/ysedc236
Hindi, A. R. (2024). A Cautious Note of Hope: The International Criminal Court’s Office of the Prosecutor, the Global South/Third World, and Palestine. UCLA Law Review, 71, 1090–1144. Scopus.
Iriani, N. I. (2010). Motivasi Intrinsik, Motivasi Ekstrinsik dan Disiplin Kerja Pengaruhnya terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada Kantor Dinas Pendidikan Kabupaten Sambas. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 8(2), 561–569.
Iswara, I. M. A. M. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Dan Reformasi Birokrasi Berbasis Elektronik Pada Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Untuk Meningkatkan Kepercayaan Publik. KERTHA WICAKSANA, 13(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.22225/kw.13.1.2019.38-44
Jones, S. D. (2025). Prosecutor-Led Bail Reform: An Observational Case Study in Philadelphia. Law and Policy, 47(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12260
Kabzińska, J., & Dukała, K. (2025). Are legal professionals more knowledgeable about eyewitness testimony factors than the general public? A survey of judges, prosecutors, and laypeople. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2024.2427633
Launiyah, L., & Rochim, F. (2022). Psikologi Hukum dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Secara E-Litigasi dan Non E-Litigasi Perspektif Hakim Pengadilan Agama. Islamic Law: Jurnal Siyasah, 7(02), Article 02. https://doi.org/10.53429/law.v7i02.540
Lusiana, L., & Dini, Y. I. F. (2024). The Influence of Emotional Intelligence, Work Motivation, and Organizational Justice on Employee Performance with Organizational Citizenship Behavior as a Mediating Variable. Jurnal Manajemen (Edisi Elektronik), 15(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.32832/jm-uika.v15i2.16427
Malonda, J. R. (2019). Fungsi Psikologi Hukum Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. LEX CRIMEN, 8(5), Article 5. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/25676
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Analisis data kualitatif: Buku sumber tentang metode-metode baru. Universitas Indonesia Press.
Muammar, M. (2024). Quo Vadis Penegakan Hukum Bermartabat: Kritik Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Berlandaskan Stigma No Viral No Justice. PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, 4(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v4i2.2247
Nuzan, N. D., Simatupang, G. E., Situmorang, F. N., Meiliani, & Burnama, Y. (2023). Analisis Kasus Hukum Kopi Sianida Mirna Salihin: Implikasi Hukum Pidana dan Prosedur Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 7(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v7i2.5587
Parwitasari, T. A., Supanto, S., Ismunarno, I., Budyatmojo, W., & Sulistyanta, S. (2022). Kesadaran Hukum Dan Etika Dalam Menggunakan Media Sosial. Gema Keadilan, 9(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2022.16032
Pratiwi, A., Adys, A. K., & Abdi, A. (2024). Analisis Kinerja Kejaksaan Negeri Dalam Penanganan Perkara Korupsi. Kajian Ilmiah Mahasiswa Administrasi Publik (KIMAP), 5(1), Article 1.
Ronaldi, A. (2023). Reformasi Sistem Pengawasan Terhadap Jaksa Penuntut Umum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v4i1.41
Rostad, I. S., & Langvik, E. (2025). “It’s the workload, not the pictures that keep me up at night.” Experiences of Norwegian police prosecutors working with child abuse cases. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 80. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2024.100723
Runturambi, A. J. S., Aswindo, M., & Meiyani, E. (2024). No Viral No Justice: A Criminological Review of Social Media-Based Law Enforcement from the Perspective of Progressive Law. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i1.1361
Sihombing, D. C., Syahrin, A., Ablisar, M., & Mulyadi, M. (2023). Penguatan Kewenangan Jaksa Selaku Dominus Litis Sebagai Upaya Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Berorientasi Keadilan Restoratif. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.56128/jkih.v3i2.42
Sucipto, H., Suaedi, F., Setijaningrum, E., Amiati, M., & Nasution, R. S. (2024). Transformation of Public Trust in Restorative Justice by the Prosecutor’s Office: An Islamic and Social Law Approach in the Contemporary Era. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v3i2.9938
Sulchan, A., & Ghani, M. G. (2017). Mekanisme Penuntutan Jaksa Penuntut Umum terhadap Tindak Pidana Anak. Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.30659/jua.v1i1.2218
Syawali, I., Suriadi, A., & Komalasari, S. (2021). Kecerdasan Emosional dan Kecerdasan Spiritual Terhadap Etos Kerja Karyawan. Jurnal Al-Husna, 2(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.18592/jah.v2i1.4516
Tinambunan, W. D., & Siwi, G. R. (2022). Dinamika Kedudukan Hukum Jaksa sebagai Pengacara Negara Pasca Undang-Undang Kejaksaan. Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v6i2.4586
Troncoso, F., & Weber, R. (2024). The Steiner tree Prosecutor: Revealing and disrupting criminal networks through a single suspect. PLoS ONE, 19(12). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312827
Weilie, H., & Jianping, W. (2009). Prosecutorial reform in 2007. Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Yearbooks: Legal Development, 3, 69–75. Scopus.
Wibowo, A. (2015). Independensi Kejaksaan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum, 12(1), Article 1.
Wonda, T. A. (2024). Does emotional intelligence have a contribution to employee performance enhancement? Empirical evidence from the public sectors. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2415525. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2415525
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Body, Mind and Culture
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
