Cultural, Social, and Community Psychology Health Communication, Care Relationships, and Healthcare Systems Philosophy, Ethics, and Theoretical Foundations of Psychology and Medicine Health Humanities, Medical Humanities, and Arts-Based Health Studies Digital Mental Health, eHealth, mHealth, and Technology-Based Interventions

Digital Physiological Self-Monitoring in Pre-Service Physical Education Teacher Education: A Conceptual Mind-Body Model for Motivation, Self-Regulation, and Professional Competence

Self-Monitoring Physical Education Mind-Body Learning Self-Regulation Motivation Teacher Education

Authors

  • Karlygash Gaissina Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
  • Myrza Yernat Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
  • Nagaibayeva Zauresh S.D. Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
  • Ablaziz Issayev Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
  • Yerkebulan Yerzhanov
    yerzhanov.yerkebulan1980@gmail.com
    Абай атындағы Қазақ ұлттық педагогикалық университеті,
Vol. 13 No. 10 (2026): October
Theoretical Study(ies)

Downloads

Objective: This article proposes a conceptual mind-body learning model for integrating digital physiological self-monitoring into pre-service physical education teacher education.

Methods and Materials: A narrative conceptual synthesis used purposive theoretical sampling across literature on wearable monitoring, embodied cognition, interoceptive awareness, self-determination theory, self-regulated learning, teacher competence, learning analytics ethics, and digital pedagogy. No original empirical data were collected, and no effectiveness claims are made.

Findings: Educational value lies in guided comparison of device feedback with subjective bodily experience, motivational meaning, context, and pedagogical judgment. A five-phase cycle links bodily observation, subjective interpretation, motivational meaning, self-regulatory action, and pedagogical translation. The phases are iterative rather than linear.

Conclusion: The model defines its boundaries, three indicator-sensitivity tiers, no-device alternatives, cultural adaptation requirements, minimum safeguards, and indicators for future testing. Physiological self-monitoring should function as a human-centered reflective resource rather than a fitness-ranking or grading tool. Its effects on motivation, self-regulation, well-being, equity, and professional competence require empirical testing before it can be recommended as evidence-based practice.