Psychological Factors in the Development of Students’ Reading Competence through Literary Education
Downloads
Objective: The development of students’ reading competence is an important educational goal in contemporary literary education, particularly in contexts where learners are expected to engage critically, emotionally, and culturally with literary texts. This study aims to examine the psychological and cultural dimensions of developing students’ reading competence through the teaching of literary works.
Methods and Materials: This study is based on a qualitative methodological and pedagogical analysis of literature teaching practices, with particular attention to the teaching of epic and prose works in secondary education. The research draws on psychological, pedagogical, and methodological literature related to reading competence, reader response, motivation, cognitive development, and literary interpretation. The study systematizes instructional strategies that support students’ gradual movement from text comprehension to interpretation, reflection, critical thinking, and independent reading.
Findings: The findings indicate that psychologically informed and culturally responsive approaches to literary education can strengthen students’ motivation to read, improve their understanding of literary texts, and develop interpretive and reflective thinking. Methods such as guided reading, question–answer strategies, problem-based tasks, level-based assignments, collective learning, modular learning, and the use of information and communication technologies help students engage more actively with literary texts. Literary education also supports empathy, value formation, cultural identity, and the development of students’ independent reading culture.
Conclusion: Literary education can serve as an effective pedagogical and psychological tool for developing reading competence among students. When literary texts are taught through interactive, reflective, and culturally grounded methods, students become more competent, motivated, and culturally aware readers.
Downloads
Aifang, X., Ahmad, N. K., & Abd Rahman, S. N. (2024). Impact of multicultural literature on intercultural communicative competence development in English language education: A systematic review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(11), 308-324. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.11.16
Calafato, R., & Simmonds, K. (2022). Linkages between literary response, aesthetic competence, and literary competence in the EFL classroom. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 75, 101214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101214
Heggernes, S. L. (2021). A critical review of the role of texts in fostering intercultural communicative competence in the English language classroom. Educational Research Review, 33, 100390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100390
Heyne, N., Gnambs, T., Lockl, K., & Neuenhaus, N. (2023). Predictors of adolescents’ change in reading literacy: the role of reading strategies, reading motivation, and declarative metacognition. Current Psychology, 42(36), 32061-32075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04184-7
Lenhart, J., & Richter, T. (2025). Does reading a single short story of literary fiction improve social-cognitive skills? Testing the priming hypothesis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 19(1), 165. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000533
Li, Y., & Yan, L. (2024). Which reading comprehension is better? A meta-analysis of the effect of paper versus digital reading in recent 20 years. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 14, 100142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2024.100142
McBreen, M., & Savage, R. (2021). The impact of motivational reading instruction on the reading achievement and motivation of students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational psychology review, 33(3), 1125-1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09584-4
Peras, I., Klemenčič Mirazchiyski, E., Japelj Pavešić, B., & Mekiš Recek, Ž. (2023). Digital versus paper reading: A systematic literature review on contemporary gaps according to gender, socioeconomic status, and rurality. European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 13(10), 1986-2005. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13100142
Secora, K., & Maples, A. G. (2025). Storybooks as a context for theory of mind intervention: A systematic review. Reading and Writing, 38(10), 2805-2848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10617-5
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Body, Mind and Culture

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








